Article information

Korean J Child Stud. 2020;41(6):1-7

Publication date (electronic) : 2020 December 31

doi : https://doi.org/10.5723/kjcs.2020.41.6.1

Sun Huh

Professor, Department of Parasitology and Institute of Medical Education, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea

허선

한림대학교 의과대학 기생충학교실 및 의학교육연구소 교수

Corresponding Author: Sun Huh, Professor, Department of Parasitology and Institute of Medical Education, Hallym University College of Medicine, 1 Hallymdaehak-gil, Chuncheon, Gangwon-do, Korea E-mail: shuh@hallym.ac.kr

Received 2020 September 10; Accepted 2020 November 10.

Trans Abstract

Introduction

Background/rationale: In February 2016, I proposed some development strategies for the Korean Journal of Child Studies, including more professional manuscript editing, international-level formatting of the verso page and back matter, improvements of the journal homepage, transformation into an English-language journal, and deposition to PubMed Central (Huh, 2016). Four years have passed since I made these suggestions; therefore, it is time to recheck the degree to which the journal has made these improvements to reach the international level.

Objectives: This study aimed to examine the journal’s status in terms of its style and format, homepage, and indexing in international databases. The results are compared with the journal’s previous status in 2015. These findings may help editors and society board members to plan further strategies to develop the Korean Journal of Child Studies into an international-level journal.

Methods

Ethics statement: This is a literature-based analysis; therefore, neither institutional review board approval nor informed consent was required.

Study design: This is a follow-up descriptive study analyzing the style and format of the journal, whether it satisfies digital standards for journals, and journal metrics.

Data sources/measurement: The style and format of the April 2020 issue (Volume 41, Number 2) of the Korean Journal of Child Studies was checked based on the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE, http://icmje.org) and Scientific Style and Format 8th edition published by Council of Science Editors (http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/ ). Journal metrics were calculated from the Web of Science Core Collection (R) on September 7, 2020. The impact factor and total cites were counted. The above results were compared with the issue of December 2015 (Volume 36, Number 6) (Huh, 2016).

Statistical analysis: A descriptive analysis was done. A comparison was made without using statistical techniques because all subjects were included in the data.

Results

Journal’s style and format: Changes of the verso page are presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Changes of the Verso page of the Korean Journal of Child Studies from 2015 to 2020

Article-level improvements are presented in Table 2.

Table 2

Changes of Article-level Content, Style, and Formatting in the Korean Journal of Child Studies from 2015 to 2020

The back matter, including instructions to authors and research and publication ethics, was changed as shown in Table 3.

Table 3

Changes of Publication type and Ethical Issues in the Korean Journal of Child Studies from 2015 to 2020

The status of the April 2020 issue in terms of permission for use of measurement tools, IRB approval, and statements of informed consent is presented in Table 4.

Table 4

The Present Condition of the April 2020 Issue of the Korean Journal of Child Studies

The journal homepage and other digital standards were dramatically improved to the top-tier level (Table 5).

Table 5

Changes of the Journal Homepage and Digital Standards of Journals in the Korean Journal of Child Studies from 2015 to 2020

Journal metrics: Changes of the impact factor and total cites of the journal from 2015 to 2019 from the Web of Science Core Collection are presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1

Impact factor and total cites of the Korean Journal of Child Studies in the Web of Science Core Collection from 2015 to 2019.

Discussion

Key results: Among the development strategies proposed in 2016, the following were greatly improved: specific aims and scope, official ISO abbreviations, open access declarations, international-level layout, manuscript editing, detailed instructions to authors, and journal digital standards (JATS XML, ePub 3.0, DOI, CrossMark, FundRef, text and data mining, ORCID). However, the suggestions were not followed for the following: change of the journal title; permission to use others’ measurement tools; limiting the publication years of the references; requiring a statement of IRB approval (with its number); requiring an informed consent statement; indexing in MEDLINE, Scopus, and SSCI; ensuring the long-term tenure of an editor-in-chief; and internationalizing the editorial board membership. In the Web of Science, the 2015 impact factor was calculated as 0.009, while that of 2019 was 0.00. In contrast, the cites per 2 years in Scopus rose from 0.03 in 2015 to 0.07 in 2019.

Interpretation and suggestion: The above findings reflect the laborious work by editorial board members and the society to improve the journal’s style and format. The adoption of digital standards by the journal was impressive. Some suggestions may be difficult to implement, including those regarding the journal title, the language of the text, limiting the publication years of the references, and the editor’s term of service.

Of the suggestions that have not yet been implemented, obtaining permission to use others’ measurement tools is a copyright issue (Table 4). The Korean Journal of Child Studies is a non-profit scholarly journal, so that no financial gain from the journal is expected. Nonetheless, authors of measurement tools and commercial publishers can raise copyright issues. Korean authors may not insist on copyright because they understand the characteristics of the journal very clearly. However, the situation is different for commercial publishing companies. There has been a previously unreported case in which a commercial publishing company continued to request that a Korean journal editor remove a table containing a measurement tool, even though the journal editor paid the fee for using the tool. Eventually, the table was removed. Although this was a very rare case, this type of issue could occur at any time. Permission to use others’ measurement tools should be dealt with using caution. Authors submitting manuscripts to the journal should try to obtain permission from the original authors of measurement tools. However, sometimes, it may be difficult to contact authors, especially if the source is a master’s or doctoral thesis. A university cannot provide personal information, including email and telephone numbers, for their graduates. In such cases, the author should inform the editor during the submission process that an attempt was made to contact the author of the measurement tool. The editor of the journal should provide a policy on the use of measurement tools without permission.

Statements describing IRB approval and informed consent should be seriously considered as a matter of journal policy. Out of 12 articles in the April 2020 issue, two articles analyzing public data could be exempted from the requirement for IRB approval and informed consent. Furthermore, the six surveys administered to adults could also be exempted because there is neither health risk nor privacy infringement to subjects (Korea Ministry of Government Legislation, 2017). In contrast, three articles dealing with child or adolescent subjects provided neither a statement of IRB approval nor a statement of informed consent. In these studies, informed consent from subjects and their parents should have been obtained because they were vulnerable subjects (Table 4).

The present Editor-in-Chief, Joo-Yeon Lee, informed me of the review results by the Scopus Content Selection & Advisory Board dispatched on August 29, 2020. The Korean Journal of Child Studies was not accepted for Scopus inclusion for the following reasons: few citations by Scopus journals; some of the abstracts are too short and do not provide adequate details; many journals already cover this subject area; and the journal title implies that it is international, but the stated aims and scope do not support this. The last point may not be considered to be a legitimate deficiency because the journal title implies that the journal is local, not international. The abstract format can be fixed immediately through meticulous editing. Citation frequency by Scopus journals may be difficult to improve unless the language of the articles is changed from Korean to English-only. The content of the journal has been excellent. The methods, results, and interpretation of each article were excellent. The quality of the research in this journal has been underestimated due to its language. There is no other option to increase the citation frequency except changing the language to English and depositing the full text of articles to PubMed Central (PMC). PMC is the fulltext biomedical literature database maintained by the United States National Library of Medicine, which accepts English-journals. The scope of the Korean Journal of Child Studies includes psychology; therefore, it is eligible to be added to PMC if it is published in English only. It has been found that if local society journals are included in PMC, the citation frequency of those journals increases dramatically (Jeong & Huh, 2014). Inclusion in MEDLINE is another way to disseminate the journal to world researchers through PubMed. It is necessary to apply to MEDLINE after meticulously checking the review criteria (Huh, 2017;Huh, 2018).

As for inclusion in the Emerging Sources Citation Index (R) (ESCI), an attempt should be made to apply to the Social Science Citation Index (R) (SSCI). Even though the citation frequency is not high, the journal can be included in ESCI if it satisfies certain criteria.

Comparison with previous studies: It is difficult to find other articles with this kind of meticulous review of a journal’s status. Annals of Dermatology published a report reviewing its scientific integrity and ethics statement (Huh, 2020). In that report, it was confirmed that all studies of human subjects or human-derived materials contained statements of IRB approval or informed consent.

Limitation: This study presents the results of a literature search, so some points may not have been checked completely. For example, the original sources of measurement tools may not have been completely checked regarding the applicable copyright policies. If the source is an open-access journal or public documents, there is no need to receive permission; instead, citation of the source title suffices.

Conclusion: Since 2016, the journal’s style and format, as well as the digital standards of the journal, have improved to the international level. However, statements regarding whether permission was obtained for the use of measurement tools, IRB approval (with the approval number), and informed consent should be considered as a matter of journal policy. Ongoing efforts should be made to add the journal to MEDLINE, Scopus, and SSCI. If the journal is not listed in an international indexing database in the future, it may be difficult for the editor to continue receiving enough manuscript submissions to sustain the journal. The language should be changed to English only, and the journal editing and publication standards should be maintained in order to add the journal to international indexing databases.

Supplementary materials

Article information Continued